Warning: file_get_contents(): stream does not support seeking in /home/public/wiki.obormot.net/cookbook/simple_html_dom.php on line 75

Warning: file_get_contents(): Failed to seek to position -1 in the stream in /home/public/wiki.obormot.net/cookbook/simple_html_dom.php on line 75
Naval Gazing Main/A Spotter's Guide to Modern Warships
January 03, 2018

A Spotter's Guide to Modern Warships

Over the 70 years since the end of WW2, the nomenclature of warships has become very confused. This is for several reasons. The demise of the treaty structure removed the legal restrictions preventing categories merging. The minimum size of ship required for effective operations grew, while at the same time the need for numbers held down sizes on the top end. Different countries adopted different naming schemes for political or historical reasons, and classifications evolved over time. I’ll do my best to explain all of this, but it is of necessity an imperfect science. This list skews a bit towards what you'd see on the oceans today, or at least since the 80s, but it should be helpful in understanding what was going on since the 60s, or even earlier in combination with the previous list.

First, some definition of the weapons is necessary:

  • Guns: Typical modern naval guns run from 3 to 5". They are of limited use against low-performance aircraft and incoming missiles, but are often valuable for shore bombardment and firing shots across the bows of merchant ships to get their attention.
  • PD SAM (Point-Defense Surface-to-Air Missile): A PD SAM is designed to protect the ship it's mounted on, and maybe the ship next to it, against incoming anti-ship missiles or airplanes flying really low. It is not effective at protecting a group, or at shooting down aircraft at altitude.
  • MR SAM (Medium-range SAM): An MR SAM is an area-defense weapon. It's a threat to airplanes at significant altitude and range, and also has some capability against missiles.
  • LR SAM (Long-range SAM): A higher-powered variant of an MR SAM. More range, and probably a ballistic-missile defense capability in modern ships.
  • SSM (Surface-to-Surface Missile): A SSM is a weapon designed to kill other ships. There are two basic varieties. First, small, subsonic weapons designed to kill frigates. These are very common, but are unlikely to sink even a frigate outright. They'll badly wound a larger ship, but not kill it. Second, large, supersonic missiles designed to kill big ships. These are mostly Russian in origin, intended to be fired at US carriers.
  • ASW (Anti-Submarine Warfare) launcher: A weapon that fires depth charges ahead of or to the side of the ship. These are unguided and have relatively short range.
  • ASW torpedo: A small homing torpedo. Short-ranged, and usually has to be dropped pretty much right on top of the submarine to be effective.
  • ASW missile: A long-range ASW weapon, usually a missile fitted with a homing torpedo for a head.
  • CIWS (Close-In Weapons System): An automatic gun, usually 20-30 mm, with an attached radar. Intended to shoot down incoming SSMs autonomously.
  • Torpedo tube: A large tube for launching underwater weapons. Found mostly on submarines these days. Most common weapon is the heavy torpedo, useful against both surface ships and submarines. Some can fire SSMs, ASW missiles and cruise missiles, too.
  • Cruise missile: A land-attack missile, fired from a warship. Several hundred mile range, warhead ~1000 lbs. Can often be launched from modern ships equipped with MR or LR SAMs.
  • Helicopter: Probably the main weapon of many modern surface combatants. Capable of many roles: moving people and things around, hunting submarines, and patrolling for and attacking surface vessels.

Now, onto the ships:

  • Frigate:1 The most common type of modern surface warship. A vessel of 2,000-4,000 tons, equipped with 1-2 guns, some combination of ASW launchers, torpedoes, and ASW missiles, and a helicopter. May also carry SSMs, PD SAM systems and/or CIWS. Split between general-purpose surface warships, and specialized ASW escorts. 27-32 kts. Also called a destroyer or destroyer escort.
  • Destroyer: A slightly larger surface warship than a frigate. 3,000-8,000 tons, with 1-2 guns, CIWS and some combination of ASW weapons. Usually has an MR SAM, 4-8 SSMs and 1-2 helicopters. 30-36 kts. Normally intended as an anti-air escort, sometimes as a heavy ASW ship or an anti-surface platform. Current usage appears to be standardizing on ships with area-defense SAMs.
  • Cruiser: A heavier, larger version of the destroyer. 7,000-20,000 tons. 1-2 guns, CIWS, some ASW weapon(s) and LR SAM. SSMs and helicopters are common. Usually a heavy AAW escort, sometimes an anti-ship platform. 30-33 kts. Currently overlaps with the largest destroyers, which appear to be replacing them, as none have been built since the end of the Cold War.
  • Corvette: A smaller version of a frigate, usually without a helicopter. 500-2,000 tons. ASW weapons, 1-2 guns, and SSMs are common, some have PD SAM. Some specialize in ASW, although most are general-purpose. 30 kts.
  • Helicopter Cruiser: A ship that's the back half of a carrier welded to the front of a cruiser. 6,000-15,000 tons. Weapons can include MR SAM, Gun, CIWS and ASW weapons. 3-15 helicopters. 30 kts. Used to deploy large numbers of helicopters for ASW.
  • Helicopter/VTOL Carrier: A ship designed for carrying ASW helicopters and VTOL aircraft. 10,000-36,000 tons. Some are armed only for self-defense (PD SAM and CIWS) while others have MR or LR SAMs, ASW weapons and SSMs. 20-30 aircraft. 28-30 kts. Used for sea control and very light strike missions. Sometimes given misleading names like "helicopter destroyer", "aviation cruiser" or "through-deck command cruiser" for legal/political reasons.
  • Aircraft Carrier, Small: A ship that carries conventional airplanes to sea. Some left over from WW2, others new-built. 30,000-70,000 tons, 40-60 aircraft. Guns, CIWS, and PD SAM are common. 30-32 kts. Used for sea control, ASW, and strike missions.
  • Aircraft Carrier, Large: A very large ship that carries conventional aircraft to sea. Often nuclear powered. 70,000-100,000 tons, 90 aircraft. CIWS and PD SAM. 30 kts. Similar missions to small aircraft carriers, but more capable.
  • Submarine, early diesel: A submarine, designed for greater underwater performance than the submarine of WWII, inspired by German Type XXI. Some converted, others new-built. 1,000-2,500 tons, 6-8 torpedo tubes, sometimes deck guns. 13-18 kts submerged. Used for anti-ship missions.
  • Submarine, diesel: A submarine designed entirely for underwater operations. Limited mobility, but very stealthy. 1,200-3,000 tons, 6-10 torpedo tubes. 15-25 kts submerged. Used for anti-ship and anti-submarine missions.
  • Submarine, nuclear attack: A submarine capable of true underwater operation. Capable of sustaining high underwater speeds indefinitely, never has to snorkle. 3,500-9,000 tons. 4-8 torpedo tubes, some carry missiles. 25-45 kts submerged. Used for anti-ship and anti-submarine missions, some have land strike capability.
  • Submarine, guided missile: A submarine intended to attack ships with cruise missiles. Most nuclear-powered. 6,000-18,000 tons. 4-8 torpedo tubes, 8-24 cruise missiles. 23-33 kts submerged. Used for attacking heavy surface ships. Rare today.
  • Submarine, ballistic missile: A submarine armed with nuclear ballistic missiles. Very quiet, nuclear-powered. 8,000-25,000 tons. 4-6 torpedo tubes, 16-24 nuclear missiles. 20-25 kts submerged. Intended for destroying the world if necessary. So far, it hasn't been.
  • Minesweeper/Minehunter: A small, low-signature ship designed to deal with mines. 150-1,000 tons. 1 small gun, mine countermeasures equipment. 10-15 kts.
  • Torpedo Boat: A small, fast ship intended to fire torpedoes. 2 small guns, 4 torpedoes. 60-200 tons. 40-50 kts. For protecting coastal waters.
  • Missile Boat: A small ship intended for missile attack. 2-4 small guns, 4-8 missiles. 200-400 tons. 30-45 kts. Coastal defense.
  • Offshore Patrol Vessel (OPV): A ship intended for presence roles in coastal waters, by the Coast Guard or equivalent. 1-2 guns, may be fitted for but not with heavier weapons. 20-30 kts. Cheap, with a focus on seakeeping and high availability, and without the combat systems of proper warships. Larger ones have a helicopter.

As with the last list, I'm excluding amphibious ships and auxiliaries.


1 Note that until 1975, the USN used the word Frigate to mean a ship that is identified here as a cruiser. I was very confused when I first ran across a reference to a nuclear-powered frigate, being only familiar with the modern usage.

Comments

  1. January 05, 2018Andrew Hunter said...

    What do you think of the Kirovs? They're definitely bigger than modern cruisers, but I'm not sure if they really deserver their own BC classification. (Also, what do you think of them as ships?)

  2. January 05, 2018bean said...

    I don't like calling them battlecruisers, as they don't really fit the classical battlecruiser niche. As ships, they're kind of interesting. They were designed as flagships for the Soviet Bastion (SSBN protection) groups, which is a mission that more or less went away with the end of the Cold War. I'm not sure I see the general reason to build a big non-carrier ship like that. They were supposed to be under 'cruiser', but I may need to bump the max tonnage a bit.

  3. January 05, 2018John Schilling said...

    The Russians just call them "heavy nuclear-powered guided missile cruisers", but I'm fine with the colloquial definition. They're bigger than any cruiser that didn't get a 'B' in its abbreviation, designed to hunt down and destroy anything up to and including enemy capital ships by way of high sustained speed and the most powerful, longest-ranged type of ship-to-ship ordnance, and tough but without the pretense of impenetrable armor. That's the essence of a battlecruiser even if it is tasked with defensive missions Jackie Fisher wouldn't have appreciated. If we need to fit what is now a singular ship of a singular class into the historical classification scheme, BC is as good as anything.

    Whether it's a good design depends on two factors. First, can a salvo of twenty P-700 heavy anti-ship missiles penetrate the missile defenses of high-value targets, e.g. US carrier battle groups escorted by Aegis cruisers and destroyers? Second, is a Kirov at all survivable against the threats it is likely to face, e.g. a stand-off missile attack by a US carrier air wing? Since the first requires anti-ship missiles to trump missile defenses and the second requires missile defenses to trump anti-ship missiles, I'm skeptical. But there are some asymmetries that might favor the Russians, and in any event it may have been the best they could do at the time.

    At this time, when Russia is mostly at peace but would like to remind the world she still has a navy, Peter the Great is a large, impressive, and IMO beautiful power projection platform well suited to that role and so comparable to HMS Vanguard in 1950 or HMS Hood in 1920. Building ships for that role is extravagantly expensive, but if you already paid for it and didn't use it in the war you expected, you're going to keep it around looking big and impressive until it wears out.

  4. January 05, 2018bean said...

    I can see both sides of it. I'm a bit more of a nomenclature purist than you are, and I don't like resurrecting extinct terms. I'd probably call them Large Cruisers, which fits somewhat better.

    But there are some asymmetries that might favor the Russians, and in any event it may have been the best they could do at the time.

    We'll deal with this next Friday. I'm much less confident in the S-300 than I am in AEGIS/SM-2, but overall I think the greatest threat to them is probably torpedoes.

    Building ships for that role is extravagantly expensive, but if you already paid for it and didn't use it in the war you expected, you're going to keep it around looking big and impressive until it wears out.

    Agreed. The Kirovs do have enough power to be genuinely useful warships (unlike the Iowas) and they're good at the presence role, too.

  5. January 05, 2018John Schilling said...
    I'm a bit more of a nomenclature purist than you are, and I don't like resurrecting extinct terms.

    How do you feel about frigates, in their various incarnations from the least powerful to the most powerful surface combatants and everything in between including at least one period of nonexistence and resurrection?

  6. January 05, 2018bean said...

    How do you feel about frigates, in their various incarnations from the least powerful to the most powerful surface combatants and everything in between including at least one period of nonexistence and resurrection?

    Do I wish the British had thought of some other term in WWII? Yes. But I'm also not going to insist on an entirely idiosyncratic term when the modern usage is well-established and even marginally coherent. The pre-1975 USN usage was just irritating. On the other hand, there isn't a consensus on what to call the Kirovs. If every single reference book called them battlecruisers, then I wouldn't disagree. But that's not the case.

  7. January 05, 2018Andrew Hunter said...

    We could bring back "pocket battleship..."

  8. January 05, 2018bean said...

    The bit where we don't have any active battleships for the Kirovs to be pocket versions of would seem to argue against that plan.

  9. January 09, 2018Philistine said...

    @cassander: As small as they are, these ships would only be able to carry a handful of jets. Izumo in a hypothetical Sea Control Ship role has been projected to carry 10 F-35Bs; Dokdo (smaller, and optimized as a 'phib rather than a carrier) even less. So it doesn't matter so much if they only have room to spot 2-4 fixed-wing aircraft at a time for STO ops, as they would never launch more than that at once anyway.

  10. January 09, 2018bean said...

    @Philistine

    Cassander was commenting on my link I posted at Slate Star Codex, and so may not see your post. Because of the number of my links there that don't get comments, I usually don't set the comment mirroring up immediately.

Comments from SlateStarCodex:

Leave a comment

All comments are reviewed before being displayed.


Name (required):


E-mail (required, will not be published):

Website:

You can use Markdown in comments!


Enter value: Captcha